RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
-
- Padawan
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:51 am
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
It’s true Pierre like we say the history is written by the winners. Imagine how we will see & judge the history now if hitler won the ww2 ?
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
Unfortunately, nowadays, history is not always written by the winners. With the development of information propaganda and the media's ability to deliver this propaganda to the consumer, history is sometimes written by biased historians or simply liars who have the ability to influence information flows and, consequently, the minds of people who are subject to this influence and the education of younger generations.saroumane02 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:03 pmIt’s true Pierre like we say the history is written by the winners. Imagine how we will see & judge the history now if hitler won the ww2 ?
U. von der Leyen has just said that Russia is to blame for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people after the nuclear attack on Hiroshima in 1945. And there are people who will believe her. What is there to talk about? No comment...
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
Where the hell did she or anyone else blame Russia for Hiroshima 1945 ? I saw her criticizing Russia for nuclear saber - rattling which is pretty damn obvious.
- PIERRE WOODMAN
- The Spider
- Posts: 97230
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:48 pm
- Location: All
- Contact:
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
Yes that will be a biased aspect of the truth for sure but Vitaly is also right in is post when important people rebuild the history in order arrange their goals.saroumane02 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:03 pmIt’s true Pierre like we say the history is written by the winners. Imagine how we will see & judge the history now if hitler won the ww2 ?
I am speechless about what did Von del Layen but even more that only 1 man in France ( Philippot ) has reacted about that ...
But no one media says anything. What will believe teenagers if they listen that ??? They will trust Russian used nuclear bomb in past while the trust is only americans did this ...
This shows how Brussels lies to europeans citizens !!!
On essaye de nous manipuler comme des marrionnettes ... C'est scandaleux !!!
PW
"For 16 years WCX is a fortress resisting the changes of the internet and the hatred of morons.Thanks to the fans having always supported me but also those discovering me today. It's together that we will go the furthest !!!"
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
So again Pierre you are just accepting Russian propaganda. Seriously shame on you.
We are now trusting goebbels herself Maria Zakharova ?
This is what I have found as an actual quote :
“It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget, especially at a time when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable. No one is better poised than Japan to warn us of the extreme danger of this recklessness. As the only country that has suffered from atomic bombings, you have made the whole world listen,” she added.
You have to be real stupid or a russian ptun ass licker trying to spin that to Ursula von der Leyen saying Russia was at fault in 1945. She says threats of nuiclear bombs when we know the suffering caused by such bombs are horrible.
If she has lost the plot and you have a quote or video of this im all ears and will apopologize but as it stands now im shocked you just accept this russian propgaganda.
Is there no bottom here when it comes to being a platform for russian propaganda?
And you are suprised only Florian Philippot says this. Maybe because he is a Putin Puppet thats against Ukraine getting weapons etc.
“Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, wants to attract every country in the world into a global nuclear war, says Florian Philippot, a French politician and former MEP.
“Zelensky is asking Western countries to increase their volume of weapons deliveries. He wants a global nuclear war! Let’s quickly get rid of this insane puppet!”, Philippot tweeted.
We are now trusting goebbels herself Maria Zakharova ?
This is what I have found as an actual quote :
“It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget, especially at a time when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable. No one is better poised than Japan to warn us of the extreme danger of this recklessness. As the only country that has suffered from atomic bombings, you have made the whole world listen,” she added.
You have to be real stupid or a russian ptun ass licker trying to spin that to Ursula von der Leyen saying Russia was at fault in 1945. She says threats of nuiclear bombs when we know the suffering caused by such bombs are horrible.
If she has lost the plot and you have a quote or video of this im all ears and will apopologize but as it stands now im shocked you just accept this russian propgaganda.
Is there no bottom here when it comes to being a platform for russian propaganda?
And you are suprised only Florian Philippot says this. Maybe because he is a Putin Puppet thats against Ukraine getting weapons etc.
“Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, wants to attract every country in the world into a global nuclear war, says Florian Philippot, a French politician and former MEP.
“Zelensky is asking Western countries to increase their volume of weapons deliveries. He wants a global nuclear war! Let’s quickly get rid of this insane puppet!”, Philippot tweeted.
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C5byVupxzMEl Major wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:20 amSo again Pierre you are just accepting Russian propaganda. Seriously shame on you.
We are now trusting goebbels herself Maria Zakharova ?
This is what I have found as an actual quote :
“It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget, especially at a time when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable. No one is better poised than Japan to warn us of the extreme danger of this recklessness. As the only country that has suffered from atomic bombings, you have made the whole world listen,” she added.
You have to be real stupid or a russian ptun ass licker trying to spin that to Ursula von der Leyen saying Russia was at fault in 1945. She says threats of nuiclear bombs when we know the suffering caused by such bombs are horrible.
If she has lost the plot and you have a quote or video of this im all ears and will apopologize but as it stands now im shocked you just accept this russian propgaganda.
Is there no bottom here when it comes to being a platform for russian propaganda?
Starting from 5:55: "You brought us to your hometown of Hiroshima. the place where you have your roots and which has deeply shaped your life and leadership. Many of your relatives lost their life when the atomic bomb raised Hiroshima to the ground. You've grown up with the stories of the survivors and you wanted us to listen to the same stories. To face the past and learn something about the future. It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget. Especially at a time when Russia threatens to USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS ONCE AGAIN. It is HEINOUS"
You believe now? She literally said, that Russia threatens to use nuclear weapon ONCE AGAIN, when it never did in reality, while the US has done it twice, while implying, that Russia bombed Hiroshima (explaining: only Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, and she said Russia is threatening to USE IT THE NUCLEAR WEAPON ONCE AGAIN, suggesting that Russia is responsible). Or is Ursula also a Russian puppet?
Seriously, dude, no offense, but you're pathetic and so brain-washed, I can't believe. You believe everything that the Western media says and what Russia says is propaganda by default. It's so narrow-minded. It may be news for you, but you're too a victim of the propaganda, only this time it's Western, and they work by the same guidebook.
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
OK the internet is currently not really about fine differences in language. The quote from von der Leyen can be read 2 ways:El Major wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:20 amSo again Pierre you are just accepting Russian propaganda. Seriously shame on you.
We are now trusting goebbels herself Maria Zakharova ?
This is what I have found as an actual quote :
“It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget, especially at a time when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable. No one is better poised than Japan to warn us of the extreme danger of this recklessness. As the only country that has suffered from atomic bombings, you have made the whole world listen,” she added.
You have to be real stupid or a russian ptun ass licker trying to spin that to Ursula von der Leyen saying Russia was at fault in 1945. She says threats of nuiclear bombs when we know the suffering caused by such bombs are horrible.
If she has lost the plot and you have a quote or video of this im all ears and will apopologize but as it stands now im shocked you just accept this russian propgaganda.
Is there no bottom here when it comes to being a platform for russian propaganda?
1) "...Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again.[/b] It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable... "
suggesting that Russia used nuclear weapons before and threatens to use nuclear weapons again - clear untrue regarding a past use of nuclear weapons...
2) "...Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable...."
this could mean also nuclear weapons were used in the past already (by the US ), and as the results in Hiroshima show any future threat about the use of nucear weapons (by the Russians) is heinous and dangerous.....
Personally I have no doubt that the US would use nuclear weapons if it could prove beneficial for them......
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
OK, I admit that I was exaggerating a bit in my post, but, it's just the harsher wording in my post, but how does that change the essence of von der Leyen's statement and how does it justify it????
This is a brazen and licentious manipulation by a high ranking politician who, not only lies, manipulatively intertwines historical events from different times, blasphemously plays on the memory of the same Japanese, and those people who really understand the point and know the real history.
1). Russia, represented by high-ranking politicians!!!, has never publicly threatened nuclear weapons! This is where von der Leyen's lies lie. There is not a single proof of this. Russia has in its arsenal, nuclear deterrent weapons and a military doctrine, where the conditions for their use are clearly spelled out. And, in turn, Western politicians have threatened Russia with nuclear weapons! I have quoted some Western politicians, even in the rank of ministers, earlier on this forum. Almost 50 countries are fighting against Russia, and several of them have nuclear weapons, which were used against peaceful cities earlier in history. Now that's a precedent that makes real sense, not contrived and manipulative.
2). In 1945, only the US had nuclear weapons!, and they used them when there was no military necessity to do so. Japan was already pretty much defeated. The USSR did not have nuclear weapons in 1945, and the latter never used them, and even initiated treaties on limiting nuclear weapons arsenals, which was later done by Russia, as the legal successor of the Soviet Union.
This is a brazen and licentious manipulation by a high ranking politician who, not only lies, manipulatively intertwines historical events from different times, blasphemously plays on the memory of the same Japanese, and those people who really understand the point and know the real history.
1). Russia, represented by high-ranking politicians!!!, has never publicly threatened nuclear weapons! This is where von der Leyen's lies lie. There is not a single proof of this. Russia has in its arsenal, nuclear deterrent weapons and a military doctrine, where the conditions for their use are clearly spelled out. And, in turn, Western politicians have threatened Russia with nuclear weapons! I have quoted some Western politicians, even in the rank of ministers, earlier on this forum. Almost 50 countries are fighting against Russia, and several of them have nuclear weapons, which were used against peaceful cities earlier in history. Now that's a precedent that makes real sense, not contrived and manipulative.
2). In 1945, only the US had nuclear weapons!, and they used them when there was no military necessity to do so. Japan was already pretty much defeated. The USSR did not have nuclear weapons in 1945, and the latter never used them, and even initiated treaties on limiting nuclear weapons arsenals, which was later done by Russia, as the legal successor of the Soviet Union.
- PIERRE WOODMAN
- The Spider
- Posts: 97230
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:48 pm
- Location: All
- Contact:
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
So this sentence is supposed means "in the future" or as if they used before and will do it again ???when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again.
Because I am not good with english and I can be wrong but then all people who complain about this sentence are supposed have my bad english level ???
Seems a bit easy no ???
Et pour ceux qui pensent que je me trompe :
PW
"For 16 years WCX is a fortress resisting the changes of the internet and the hatred of morons.Thanks to the fans having always supported me but also those discovering me today. It's together that we will go the furthest !!!"
Re: RUSSIA - UKRAINE 2022 CONFLICT
Where are all the people besides russians trying to spin this? You said yourself its one man in France and he is clearly very anti Ukraine from the extreme right.. Its pretty clear it means nuclear weapons have not been used since 1945 and russia is now threating to use such weapons again. At no point have there been any sentence from her with russia 1945 and russia being responsible for those bombs in the past.PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 7:20 amSo this sentence is supposed means "in the future" or as if they used before and will do it again ???when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again.
Because I am not good with english and I can be wrong but then all people who complain about this sentence are supposed have my bad english level ???
Seems a bit easy no ???
Et pour ceux qui pensent que je me trompe :
378827290_1742294299566253_4337129398103263815_n.jpg
PW
You are the dumbest man I have ever talked to. Last time you were talking about how USA lied in the UN when they attacked Afghanistan and Biden attacked Iran. No mentiions about Iraq. The easiest facts possible you get wrong besides spreading russian propaganda so you obviously also manage to not understand this.BlackSon wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 5:35 amhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C5byVupxzMEl Major wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:20 amSo again Pierre you are just accepting Russian propaganda. Seriously shame on you.
We are now trusting goebbels herself Maria Zakharova ?
This is what I have found as an actual quote :
“It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget, especially at a time when Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons once again. It is heinous, it is dangerous – and in the shadow of Hiroshima, it is unforgivable. No one is better poised than Japan to warn us of the extreme danger of this recklessness. As the only country that has suffered from atomic bombings, you have made the whole world listen,” she added.
You have to be real stupid or a russian ptun ass licker trying to spin that to Ursula von der Leyen saying Russia was at fault in 1945. She says threats of nuiclear bombs when we know the suffering caused by such bombs are horrible.
If she has lost the plot and you have a quote or video of this im all ears and will apopologize but as it stands now im shocked you just accept this russian propgaganda.
Is there no bottom here when it comes to being a platform for russian propaganda?
Starting from 5:55: "You brought us to your hometown of Hiroshima. the place where you have your roots and which has deeply shaped your life and leadership. Many of your relatives lost their life when the atomic bomb raised Hiroshima to the ground. You've grown up with the stories of the survivors and you wanted us to listen to the same stories. To face the past and learn something about the future. It was a sobering start to the G7 and one that I will not forget. Especially at a time when Russia threatens to USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS ONCE AGAIN. It is HEINOUS"
You believe now? She literally said, that Russia threatens to use nuclear weapon ONCE AGAIN, when it never did in reality, while the US has done it twice, while implying, that Russia bombed Hiroshima (explaining: only Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, and she said Russia is threatening to USE IT THE NUCLEAR WEAPON ONCE AGAIN, suggesting that Russia is responsible). Or is Ursula also a Russian puppet?
Seriously, dude, no offense, but you're pathetic and so brain-washed, I can't believe. You believe everything that the Western media says and what Russia says is propaganda by default. It's so narrow-minded. It may be news for you, but you're too a victim of the propaganda, only this time it's Western, and they work by the same guidebook.