TRIXXXIE FOX

Comment and ask everything about each auditioned girls during the Woodman Casting X. Exclusive informations inside.
Spielberg
Guru
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:50 pm

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by Spielberg »

HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:00 pm

You can’t accuse me of lying when you don’t have the court documents. And if you had, you wouldn’t accuse me of lying. ;-) 6 pieces of evidence we brought to the table are indeed, for now, deleted.
If you've had sexual relations with older men when you were still a child and below 18 then it seems you have been sexually groomed by Denis from a young age and this is why you feel it is normal. But like I said, making excuses about deleted evidences is not going to help Denis. You had every opportunity to come forth to the court. He's guilty :roll:

HELENA CATOIR
Padawan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 26, 2024 10:50 am

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by HELENA CATOIR »

Spielberg wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:01 pm
HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 6:49 pm

In another case a mom came to Dennis literally selling her daughter as hooker but she was 17 (turning 18 in 2 or 3 months). The girl in person wanted it to so there was consent! And to be honest, a girl of 17 and 10 months or a girl of 18 have the same body.


So you are saying a girl from 17 can't have sex willingly? I know what I did what I was 17... I was very sexually active and also with people who were 45 at that time,
Jesus Christ! A 17 year old cannot give consent. What makes you and him so dangerous is that you don't see anything wrong with this. I don't think jail is enough. It's quite clear that both you and Denis need psychiatric help! :shock: :o
For sure a 17 year old can give consent!!
So let's say the day before turning 18 (so 17 at the moment) she is not able to give consent but a day after she can? Don't you see what a stupid point you are making?

HELENA CATOIR
Padawan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 26, 2024 10:50 am

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by HELENA CATOIR »

Spielberg wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:08 pm
HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:00 pm

You can’t accuse me of lying when you don’t have the court documents. And if you had, you wouldn’t accuse me of lying. ;-) 6 pieces of evidence we brought to the table are indeed, for now, deleted.
If you've had sexual relations with older men when you were still a child and below 18 then it seems you have been sexually groomed by Denis from a young age and this is why you feel it is normal. But like I said, making excuses about deleted evidences is not going to help Denis. You had every opportunity to come forth to the court. He's guilty :roll:
By law I was a minor, not a child. learn the law before making accusations.
I met Dennis when I was 21... So at that time I was totally independent and now as well :-)
I can make decisions for myself, then and now.

I chose to meet with older guys when I was 17, no one and certainly not Dennis since I didn't even know him at that point. So don't you see that you are jumping to conclusions without even thinking or knowing a little bit of background info.

Spielberg
Guru
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:50 pm

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by Spielberg »

HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:17 pm

By law I was a minor, not a child. learn the law before making accusations.
I met Dennis when I was 21... So at that time I was totally independent and now as well :-)
I can make decisions for myself, then and now.
Yeah but the man you was having sex with was not 18. You were 17 and he was 45. You are talking stupid things now lady. That is not legal. Or I don't know which part of the world you're in. Anyways I'm tired of this conversation. Good luck with Denis.

User avatar
PIERRE WOODMAN
The Spider
Posts: 97658
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:48 pm
Location: All
Contact:

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by PIERRE WOODMAN »

The fast conclusions became a generality nowadays unfortunately !!!
I experience that every day …

PW
"For 16 years WCX is a fortress resisting the changes of the internet and the hatred of morons.Thanks to the fans having always supported me but also those discovering me today. It's together that we will go the furthest !!!"

AYP00
Guru
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 2:40 am

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by AYP00 »

Spielberg wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:23 pm
HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:17 pm

By law I was a minor, not a child. learn the law before making accusations.
I met Dennis when I was 21... So at that time I was totally independent and now as well :-)
I can make decisions for myself, then and now.
Yeah but the man you was having sex with was not 18. You were 17 and he was 45. You are talking stupid things now lady. That is not legal. Or I don't know which part of the world you're in. Anyways I'm tired of this conversation. Good luck with Denis.
According to internet age of consent in Belgium is 16. So either Helena or her lawyer are giving wrong info. I think even in Belgium you can’t be found guilty in rape/sex of/with minor if said person older than age of consent.
From the point of law 17, 29 or 55 year old woman is not a minor because they older than age of consent.

HELENA CATOIR
Padawan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 26, 2024 10:50 am

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by HELENA CATOIR »

AYP00 wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:40 pm
Spielberg wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:23 pm
HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:17 pm

By law I was a minor, not a child. learn the law before making accusations.
I met Dennis when I was 21... So at that time I was totally independent and now as well :-)
I can make decisions for myself, then and now.
Yeah but the man you was having sex with was not 18. You were 17 and he was 45. You are talking stupid things now lady. That is not legal. Or I don't know which part of the world you're in. Anyways I'm tired of this conversation. Good luck with Denis.
According to internet age of consent in Belgium is 16. So either Helena or her lawyer are giving wrong info. I think even in Belgium you can’t be found guilty in rape/sex of/with minor if said person older than age of consent.
From the point of law 17, 29 or 55 year old woman is not a minor because they older than age of consent.
Age of consent is indeed 16 with people under 18. When the person the 16+ minor has sex with is above 18, that person can still be accused of sex with minors, depending situation and age.

AYP00
Guru
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 2:40 am

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by AYP00 »

HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:51 pm
AYP00 wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:40 pm
Spielberg wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:23 pm


Yeah but the man you was having sex with was not 18. You were 17 and he was 45. You are talking stupid things now lady. That is not legal. Or I don't know which part of the world you're in. Anyways I'm tired of this conversation. Good luck with Denis.
According to internet age of consent in Belgium is 16. So either Helena or her lawyer are giving wrong info. I think even in Belgium you can’t be found guilty in rape/sex of/with minor if said person older than age of consent.
From the point of law 17, 29 or 55 year old woman is not a minor because they older than age of consent.
Age of consent is indeed 16 with people under 18. When the person the 16+ minor has sex with is above 18, that person can still be accused of sex with minors, depending situation and age.
English wikipedia says that in Belgium there is close-in-age exemption when one of the partners is below age of consent (14 or 15 years old) and other is 2 or 3 years older.
Or can you give us a quote from Belgium criminal code?

Spielberg
Guru
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 3:50 pm

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by Spielberg »

HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 8:51 pm

Age of consent is indeed 16 with people under 18. When the person the 16+ minor has sex with is above 18, that person can still be accused of sex with minors, depending situation and age.
Exactly! Even if it's 16, the other person has to be 18. That 2 or 3 years doesn't count when it's 45 year old man. That is a sexual offense.

BiTod
Padawan
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:53 am

Re: TRIXXXIE FOX

Post by BiTod »

HELENA CATOIR wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 4:34 pm

Trixxxie and Nanoe were both one of those girls Dennis wanted to help. Nanoe was already an OnlyFans model and wanted to become more famous. Trixxxie had already started porn with various Deutch / Belgians productions and wanted to become more famous in porn. They both did a videochat with Pierre. Nanoe with Pierre together with Dennis and Trixxxie with Pierre without Dennis because she only got his phone by Dennis and contacted Pierre directly.
Pierre has a strong opinion on this situation happening now since he knew the girls when they were both still in contact with Dennis and know how they talked about him and then after they broke contact with Dennis. Pierre still has the complete whatsapp chats from the girls since the beginning and the least we can say about that that their messages are odd when looking at the dates they were send and the dates they gave to police they were 'raped' by Dennis.
I don't want to dampen your spirits about using WhatsApp, Twitter, or emails as evidence Mrs Burkas, but with all due respect if the girl's WhatsApp messages had "odd looking dates" it also goes to reason that any dates Pierre can show could also be "odd".
The WhatsApp below appears to be from you, but was it?
whatsapp_chat (1).png
Despite your apparent desperation to protect Pierre in all this, he is still calling Trixxie a liar by defending your husband. A young woman who only had good things to say about Pierre and had no reason to lie about your husband's behaviour.
Nobody ever accused your husband of having sex with a pre-teen, but until the age of 18 is reached the person is still a minor. (child)
Your husband has been convicted as a rapist and a child molester, and seeing how it is illegal for a 45-year-old man to have sex with a 16-year-old child in Belgium that makes him a paedophile, doesn't matter how you want to cut it up that's what he is in prison for. So both you and Pierre are supporting a paedophile and you really do need to deal with that fact.
PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:
Sun May 26, 2024 6:50 pm
But Friday there was an arrest request made against him in Hungary and I want see when he will be again seat down in any Budapest restaurant ( of course he will publish maybe some old pics to pretend ) and the Hungarian court that he called a "joke" want show him how much a joke they are so my lawyer and me we expect a sanction strong enough to have an EU stop request and all airports. Maybe we will fail on that and he will continue to play the clown in future with his lies but if we succeed we are sure to obtain the closure of most of his social medias becuase it's an automatic rule when there is a justice decision
So, does that mean if they catch this Tommy and convict him, he's still not guilty until he appeals? Will they close down his social media on the first appeal or the second one? Or, can he just keep making appeals and never be convicted? :roll:

Post Reply