No , I claim that ukronazis idiotically claim they have only lost 9-10k people. Irrecoverable losses of ukronazis is WAY in excess of 200000, probably well bast 300000, with well over 100000 dead.pierro wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 6:55 pmI simply can't understand the logic, the Ukrainian army at the time of the start of the war consisted of about 1 million people. You claim that Ukraine has lost more than 10,000 people, well, let's believe that Ukraine has lost 20,000, while you claim that everything is going well for Russia, the losses are less than those of Ukraine (although, according to the logic of war, the losses of the attacking side are always greater). That is, Russia lost less than 20,000 soldiers. Why then is it necessary to mobilize another 300,000?
Several answers:
1. Everything is going very badly for Russia and there are not enough people.
2. In fact, Russia lost more than 100,000 people, according to world war analysts (these are the total losses of those killed and wounded who cannot return to the front)
3. In recent months, Russia has not made any progress in the war. Zaporozhye and Kherson regions were not completely captured, moreover, Ukraine is confidently liberating the captured areas and is already approaching Kherson. Kharkov region was completely liberated by Ukraine. Plans for the occupation of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions have not been fully implemented either.
4. Putin decided to simply overwhelm Ukraine with quantity, hoping to take the number and further prolong the war and continue the nuclear, humanitarian and energy blackmail of Europe and continue trying to force the world to recognize the occupied territories of Ukraine as Russian.
As a result, it turns out that Ukraine does not give up, assistance to Ukraine is increasing, sanctions are intensifying, the occupied territories are not recognized.
It's hard to call it a success in my opinion.
Only losers, fakes and fraudsters think Russia has lost 100000




Estimates vary from 137000-200000 maximum of Russian and LDNR troops fighting. Even a 20% loss rate would make reunified land completely impossible to defend. They would have had to mobilise 3 months earlier if it was the case, anyway.
Mobilisation is needed to free existing forces to attack and defend the frontline. These mobilised soldiers are needed because new military districts have been formed, which require them -and having existing forces in addition to attacking and defending the 1100km line of contact, having to exhaust themselves protecting the 120000 square kilometres of reunified land - is too much to ask.