In He-said-she-said situations, especially when it goes public, I tend to believe the girl less than the man. Sorry for the SJW's, feminists or "progressives" who love to throw around the "m word" (misogyny and it's derivatives), but it's the logical mindset and, let's face it, pornstars are hardly a demographic known for good decision-making and wholesome mentality.
But this isn't even it. His account and her account align in a couple of major points at least. So my conclusion is that: 1) Lana took the "robotic" remark hard since she presents herself as an "artist" to her fans and maybe she has even convinced herself that it's true. 2) From there, she took "suggestion" and made it "coercion" about the watersports and DAP, a huge leap of logic that is common nowadays for the women of feminist persuasion. There's no power dynamic here, she's no schoolgirl but an adult, and he's not his boss, his teacher or his agent (she wasn't even staying in Budapest on his dime).
BTW, Ellipsis, there's so much "probity" a man can do, and certainly Woodman does more than everyone else by taping all the interaction. Your suggestion of having election-style third-party observation is ludicrous not the least for the fact that it'd be the end of porn financially speaking.