LANA RHOADES

Comment and ask everything about each auditioned girls during the Woodman Casting X. Exclusive informations inside.
Ellipsis
Padawan
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 5:22 am

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by Ellipsis »

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:The answer is obvious :
IF I DO SOMETHING PHYSICALY TO A PORNSTAR LIKE LANA RHOADES WITHOUT HER CONSCENT OR AGENT CONSCENT I AM FINISH THE NEXT DAY.
This is an uncertified statement; females continue to enter the industry every week so those working feel threatened that if they dispute what's going on, they may not be hired for future shoots. And if you have unscrupulous agents, then? Spiegler is known to forbid his talent from having a no list. Power doesn't reside with talent. And that's why you believe you have license to exploit and abuse at your discretion.

Darren73
Guru
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by Darren73 »

If a performer feels scared or nervous then they should leave through the door they came in. If what there agent or the performer didn't agree to that then the way I would see it that's yes or no. What you can't do is come on here and start accusing Pierre of being in the wrong. You was not at the casting and neither was I not anyone else. Lana has already made an accusation about rape and that is a serious allegation. So either she finds the girl in question so this can be taken further. If not then the case is closed. Innocent till proven otherwise now let's move on.

mspm89
Guru
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 1:37 am

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by mspm89 »

OK, now dropping the "neutral" stance a bit...

In He-said-she-said situations, especially when it goes public, I tend to believe the girl less than the man. Sorry for the SJW's, feminists or "progressives" who love to throw around the "m word" (misogyny and it's derivatives), but it's the logical mindset and, let's face it, pornstars are hardly a demographic known for good decision-making and wholesome mentality.

But this isn't even it. His account and her account align in a couple of major points at least. So my conclusion is that: 1) Lana took the "robotic" remark hard since she presents herself as an "artist" to her fans and maybe she has even convinced herself that it's true. 2) From there, she took "suggestion" and made it "coercion" about the watersports and DAP, a huge leap of logic that is common nowadays for the women of feminist persuasion. There's no power dynamic here, she's no schoolgirl but an adult, and he's not his boss, his teacher or his agent (she wasn't even staying in Budapest on his dime).

BTW, Ellipsis, there's so much "probity" a man can do, and certainly Woodman does more than everyone else by taping all the interaction. Your suggestion of having election-style third-party observation is ludicrous not the least for the fact that it'd be the end of porn financially speaking. :lol:

raw1
Padawan
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:50 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by raw1 »

I don't understand Pierre why are you explaining so much just put a clip similar to serenity showing truth

saifko
Padawan
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 1:59 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by saifko »

i dont know who i will believe , everone have his side of the story , but if she aready agree and set on pierre`s table , and she restore his money that means , pierre was honest with us , even if he ask her whats ever !!

anyway how she said she gonna do first dap while she already shoot it with hardx !!?
u can sue her on this lies pierre ؛)

anyway the best reactive u can make , is to upload better scenes with other american models ! this month :mrgreen:

starpower
Padawan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 5:06 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by starpower »

raw1 wrote:I don't understand Pierre why are you explaining so much just put a clip similar to serenity showing truth
How can he put a clip when she bailed before the filming took place.

saifko
Padawan
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 1:59 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by saifko »

i wish pierre already pie at her face for free , bcz this what she really deserve !! she blooked me at twitter :x
she tweet that she will shoot with dorcol , isn`t he ur friend pierre !?
friend stuck together ;)

bash413
Padawan
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 9:02 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by bash413 »

this drama is better than Game of Thrones season 4-7!

wow so much fun! i never had reading a novel or something. this is just insane and crazy as fuck.

lets be honest here who to believe: a Bitch or a Dog? i am sorry guyz but thats what u both truly are! lana is a bitch and pierre is a dog. its simple as that. this is the most heinous, dirtiest clean work that u guyz do and call urself performers. and give and take awards every year!

Pierre how about ur daughter goes to some producer for a casting and he tells her ambigiously that he will pee on her face and then she says NO. but the producer says we will see what u will feel after doing the scene and then he pees on her face when she has done the scene in the bathroom rather reluctantly.

she says that u said to her that u have footage of the video that u recorded the day before her scene, where u had to remove that footage bcz it was too dangerous to release bcz the girl in question was saying NO NO and u guyz kept on fucking her which looks and sounds like rape! thats why u removed that footage.

in all the pages before u never replied to this above statement. u talked about her allegation but never this specific sentences. seems to me u actually do remove the footage in God knows how many scenes and keep the harder stuff for ur own eyes only.

now these are only my observations and i might be wrong and u might say i am wrong but it is what it is. now regarding lana yes ran away from the room lets be realistic here man why do u think she did it?

was it bcz of only u said u will pee on her or the 4 guyz instead of 2 or 3? or u not taking no for an answer or the robotic comment? this all involves u. she ran from u man. that should hurt ur ego and no matter what u say that was a agent sent by LP or some of ur competitors or Stella Cox in england, u had her in ur room and she left willingly bot bcz of misinformation but bcz that's what she wanted. so be a man and admit that

mspm89
Guru
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 1:37 am

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by mspm89 »

^^^^ He answered to that question already. He said that the allegation is ridiculous because the day in question he shot a couple scene not involving himself (Lana Seymour is her stage name, I think). Believe him or no, you should read before writing.

Darren73
Guru
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: LANA RHOADES

Post by Darren73 »

Fuck lana Rhoades and as I've said before I think Pierre should Sue this bitch for wat she had said. The one thing u can take comfort from Pierre is that u never have to see her again. Also if true that Stella cox was the girl she was speaking to in England then fuck her too. Three girls u shud def not work with Mischa cross who is already a psychopath Lana Rhoades and Stella cox. And to all you guys who are doubting if Pierre is telling the truth then u need only to look at Pierre as the best producer of porn for the past 20 years. His integrity is still in tact enough said.

Post Reply