PW

Bon les ennemis du préso vont faire la gueule !
The condom ennemies will cry, it will be obligatory by law soon in US !
http://business.avn.com/articles/video/ ... 59630.html

PW

i guess every one prefer sex with out condoms , and also at movies ...
it is very important to do safe sex , but if u do for the girl whole STD test , what is the chances that u will get anytype of STD , when she have a negative results .

adam shemtov wrote:but if u do for the girl whole STD test , what is the chances that u will get anytype of STD , when she have a negative results

Still, there is a risk. Not everything will show up on the tests (like some forms of HPV). Also, there is such thing as a false negative. Other diseases, such as HIV, will not show up immediately in a blood test, though the individual may carry the infection.

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:Bon les ennemis du préso vont faire la gueule !
The condom ennemies will cry, it will be obligatory by law soon in US !
http://business.avn.com/articles/video/ ... 59630.html

While I support the choice to use a condom, I find this completely un-American "law" to be outrageous, and I hope it is quickly overturned. Next will they tell us we have to use a condom in a personal sex life unless we are married. What a gross overstepping of government to assert such a law on the personal liberty of the individual. Only in L.A. can something like this happen.

if u do a very good HIV test it shows in the test after 2-3 days , so let say u have open window that the girl might have unprotected sex in 2-3 after the test while waiting for the result and get infect , look at this
http://www.avert.org/hiv-aids-europe.htm
for example europe have very low rate in HIV on CZ u have 1000 women that have it , and let say more like 1500 , what is the case that u will meet a girl with HIV and after the test ? ofcours there is , but if ur not picking drug addicted whores from the street
there is a low chance , but it can't be banded

Yes, you can test a few days after infection with decent accuracy. The risk is "lower", as you say... and I guess if "lower risk of HIV" is good enough for someone, they can choose to work without protection.... Though, I do not know why one would choose this when they can virtually eliminate risk with a condom.

I am sure that despite the preferences of many of the members here, PW loses very few sales due solely to his use of condoms. It would hardly be worth the minuscule financial gain (if any is there) to put his health and reputation to undue risk.

i personally don't like condoms in private sex , and with films there is things that u can't do like creampie ...

Yes Adam but if you were doing my job and was a bit "responsable" you will use always condoms !!!
In the past I had many many many sex intercourses without condoms and I must confess it was a huge mistake ! I never considered the right level the weight and responsability it is to take the risk to give someone you love a very bad disease but since I'm with Sophie I could not imagine the simple fact I could give her a simple gonorea or any kind of little shit !!!
Even using condom you're far to be 100 % safe but at least you do "something" in that way and I know there is no better feeling than feel the difference between making my job and making love without condom with my girlfriend !
In Brussel they also spoken last year about make a law to oblige the porn industry to use condom in all productions. It's already like that on the TV channel like Canal + and today I know that, as said Rafale, it doesn't change so much the sales on the site.
Of course still 70% of the scenes are "bareback" on the site but you will never see me without ...

PW

i respect this and understand ...

OK it's the most important !

PW