Eintracht wrote:boa15, its not getting better by repeating your ludicrous conclusions which quite frankly are as irrational as they are disgusting and missing any personal maturity.
Your argumentation is the argumentation of a pedophile.

You should seek help !

..and probably a lawyer.

Honestly, being a 60+ year old guy lusting after 15 year old girls is far from any sort of sane or normal.

patbah77 wrote:
..and probably a lawyer.

Honestly, being a 60+ year old guy lusting after 15 year old girls is far from any sort of sane or normal.

Absolute right!

btw. Its not easy for me to confess, but I guess I have to revise my opinion of you, patbah77

Eintracht wrote:btw. Its not easy for me to confess, but I guess I have to revise my opinion of you, patbah77

Same here, pal

Eintracht wrote:boa15, its not getting better by repeating your ludicrous conclusions which quite frankly are as irrational as they are disgusting and missing any personal maturity.
Your argumentation is the argumentation of a pedophile.

You should seek help !

Pedophile guys are you looking for 15 yo girls...they are too old. The real ones look after prepubescent girls.

I agree with Booz. I read about a pedophile who said that when they are old enough to grow pubic hair, he did not want them.

But the law has twists and turns. A few years ago, the state of New York had 18 as the minimum drinking age. Girls from Connecticut would drive over to NY to drink and get drunk. And the NY guys would fuck them. It was the last state to raise the age to 21. And the minimum drinking age in Europe is? You could not vote until you were 21, but because of the Vietnam war, the age was lowered to 18.
The age of consent varied state by state. You also had to be sober. A few years ago an exception was made in the state of Georgia. An 18 year old black male, was at a party and a 15 year old white girl got drunk and stoned. Bubba popped her cherry on the pool table. He was arrested for rape. But the media and political activists complained, because he was a star running back in High School. He could be a star player in college. So the state changed the law. If a teenager is only 3 years older than the girl, it is OK to pop her cherry. Ignore the fact that she was too drunk to say no.

It is OK to let your boy friend see your naked 17 year old teenage body if he is in the bedroom with you. It is NOT OK to send him a picture of your naked body. Either a Polaroid or by electronic means is illegal.
Vanessa was 18 when she sent this photo to her boyfriend Zac. The silly girl thought that he would not pass it on to the whole world. If she had sent it out one year earlier, she would be arrested for child porn, as well as Zac for looking at his email.

Ah, so I see you guys agree with him and think porn with 16 year olds are perfectly fine?
Sorry guys but the "one year younger and she would have got problems" is bullshit. You have to make a limit somewhere. If you say now "Why 18? why not 17?" and the limit would been lowered to 17 you would repeat then the argument and say "Why 17, why not 16?". There has to be a limit and 18 is a pretty reasonable level that should not be touched.

The law said 18 for porn, there is no any discussion to do about it.
I agree with Boa15 only on one point, the girl of 2018 at 15 years old are very different than a girl in 1950 at 15 years old and this is because of the craziness of our world.
But it doesn't change the fact something goes wrong when you are 60 years old and wish to fuck a girl of 15.
Myself now, as you can see sometime I shoot more often mature women on the site and I like them. It wasn't like that 10 years ago but I feel my brain needs it more and more but less and less the 18 years old babes. I believe it's naturaly that my mind push me on that way and even some days I feel strange with some 18 years old girls. Particulary this year because I wasn't thinking in 2000 that 18 years later I will be shooting girls born this year.
So yes it legal, yes it's something helping you mind to keep young but yes in another way it's disturbing. But when I see someone speaking of 15 years old people, then, as some members said here, you need a spy and a good lawyer !!!

PW

Eintracht wrote: There has to be a limit and 18 is a pretty reasonable level that should not be touched.

18 is not "a pretty reasonable level" it is just a law limit and not a biologic, a moral or a psychic limit. You can be 15 and mature and 30 yo and brainless.

Of course law has to be general and the lawmaker can not make a variable limit according to the I.Q. for instance.

Of course Pierre and the others porn pros have to follow this limit of 18 because Dura lex sed lex

Booz wrote:You can be 15 and mature and 30 yo and brainless.

On that point I agree with you. Your comments proof that.

Another note: For the Prague Circus, Ricardo and other people who do want the best for Pierre, it is a GODSENT PRESENT that some dumbasses are discussing the pros of underage porn in Pierre's forum! You smart guys should also consider that!

Eintracht wrote:

Booz wrote:You can be 15 and mature and 30 yo and brainless.

On that point I agree with you. Your comments proof that.