


But until that, I'm not in hurry, life is beautiful ...
PW
everyone has a differnet taste but I agree with you that I personally also don't like a shaky camera with wunf, but its that genre POV. on the other Hand, if there was a cameraman this wunf would become more like this "Senior vs. teen Girl" videos and that could probably pull more customers as well. so I would advice Pierre to start a series with a camerman filming him with this young girls to cater to this niche...it could be a huge success, you are right johngreen. i mean there are a lot of sites that try to sell this "old guy vs. young slut" content but these guys have not the personality of Pierre, he is a Champion.johngreen1 wrote:Hi Pierre, i follow your work for over 15 years now:
here is why i mostly fail to fap to it.
Firstly your camera work is not really good.
The lighting is so horrible, that many amateurs have better video quality.
The camera movement is hectic, rushed and very shaky.
So many closeups of body parts that fill the whole screen is just gross. I get it, you do get close if you want to enhance emotions, but i porn it makes sense for a few seconds and that´s it.
These are the most issues i have.
Back in the days, when you had your camera sometimes placed, it seems as far away as possible, that was so unsatisfying . Especially on my favorite Bonny Singer, if compared your casting x with roccos scene with the black guy in it: worlds apart.
Candice Demellza is a prime example of it. Smoking hot girl, dark room shaky, fast camera movements, lots of close ups. The cut in shitty bathrooms scene near the end, man so bad. Disappointing and it happend so often, that i don´t feel like subscribing. That and the chopping and releasing the end later.
That said, you don´t have to go Kelly Madison quality, which in my opinion is absolutely top for years now.
I joined exploited college girls lately. Fantastic lighting and slow camera movements and very hot young girls, that seems to enjoy themselves.
With you slapping and pounding away, it can be hot, but there is definitely degradation and aggression behind it. Sometimes that's ok, but i feel kinda bad if wanked to it afterwards.
You have the best girls in the biz and you are a very good performer.
I loved the Emma Hix wunf, it was soooo hot. WUNF 116 was also great and you what it was best if you were a performer and gave the camera to somebody else and i don´t mean a tripod.
Personally if you would skip CastingX and Scene XXX completely and only concentrate on WUNF with you as a performer and a external camera man,better camera and lighting , the best girls you have already, you would be the top porn producer of the world.
By the way LP is horrible too, that white background feels like a hospital and no emotions are portrayed by the performs, really garbage.
Still you don't get it guys !!!if there was a cameraman this wunf would become more like this "Senior vs. teen Girl" videos and that could probably pull more customers as well. so I would advice Pierre to start a series with a camerman filming him with this young girls to cater to this niche
Non tu parle à une porte blindée de coffre fort !PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:Do I speak with the wall ???
PW