- Suit yourself.PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:Again you're wrong because if it was like that i will not have answered to you but now this is what I will do !!!![]()
![]()
![]()
PW
Rem.
- Suit yourself.PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:Again you're wrong because if it was like that i will not have answered to you but now this is what I will do !!!![]()
![]()
![]()
PW
Dude,remkang wrote:I'm new to the website as well as the forum so I may be missing some details on PW's work process, strategy and philosophy. Having said that, my point is that if PW can not show a video for some reason or the other, then he should not be telling us that what he did with that girl. I'm not saying don't show the casting (interview, conversation), but if he can not show the fucking part or whatever he did with that girl, then don't talk about it. When you say you can't show because the girl does not want you to show, then how can you talk about it? Is it not equally derogatory and unethical when somebody does not want you to show her video but you keep talking about what you did with her? My thought is - if you can't show, don't talk about it.
I will welcome thoughts and knowledge and I may even correct my position, but don't act stupid and blast my position. I'm a fan of PW but blind faith is not my cup of tea.
Rem.
what is wrong?remkang wrote:You replied twice, but never with an answer to the topic itself! I have got my answer w/o your answer.
Rem.