I'm new to the website as well as the forum so I may be missing some details on PW's work process, strategy and philosophy. Having said that, my point is that if PW can not show a video for some reason or the other, then he should not be telling us that what he did with that girl. I'm not saying don't show the casting (interview, conversation), but if he can not show the fucking part or whatever he did with that girl, then don't talk about it. When you say you can't show because the girl does not want you to show, then how can you talk about it? Is it not equally derogatory and unethical when somebody does not want you to show her video but you keep talking about what you did with her? My thought is - if you can't show, don't talk about it.

I will welcome thoughts and knowledge and I may even correct my position, but don't act stupid and blast my position. I'm a fan of PW but blind faith is not my cup of tea.


Rem.

mainly pierre mentions it if people ask for it. sometimes he mentions it to explain it is not worth to show it(cause bad quality in different ways).
and sometimes he mentions it because he doesn't have right to show and thinks it is a pity.
you are on a porn forum, girls fuck with him not because they are drunk in a dance club but because they want to try it and have fun so don't be so prude.
and they can say that it is false to boyfriend/family, not the same if she is in picture or video so whatever...

For me, it's just fine when Pierre gives us some clues to what (might had) happened after the interview. Thankfully this enables us to fantasize and invent our own happy endings. It's also a huge source of comments on the forum which only shows that Pierre's approach is the right one.
It's your right to express your negative feeling about that, but it's not gonna change anything in Pierre's vision.

"mainly pierre mentions it if people ask for it" -

Not a matter of prudishness, matter of ethics. You can't reveal something which you aren't supposed to in the guise of having been questioned about it. When somebody wants you to not show her video, amongst the many reasons one reason could be that she does not want the world to know that she was with you in the first place or contemplated being with you and then when you show her interview and talk about what you did with her, it defeats the purpose.


"but it's not gonna change anything in Pierre's vision" - I'm perfectly fine with that. The aim is to discuss and learn not to chide or change.


Rem.

remkang wrote:" When somebody wants you to not show her video, amongst the many reasons one reason could be that she does not want the world to know that she was with you in the first place or contemplated being with you and then when you show her interview and talk about what you did with her, it defeats the purpose.

Rem.

I've already answered about it, what do you expect when you fuck with a porn director, it is not a love affair, he is not your secret lover. pierre fucks girls in the ass to know how they react and act and if they are able to work for him. you don't accept to be shown to the world, it is your right but don't expect him to get shy and help your reputation as a prude girl that he had evidences you are not.
sex is good for life, if morons can't understand a girl have right to get many orgasms she wants it is funny cause they often are same people to masturbate in private with shame in front of videos

Totoro, this guy has already mention this in other topic and it's clear he just come here to push up the wrong way.
No time to loose with it ... and anyway it's my forum, it's free and I can tell what ever I want without anyone decide what I have to tell or not on my behalf !!!

PW

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:Totoro, this guy has already mention this in other topic and it's clear he just come here to push up the wrong way.
No time to loose with it ... and anyway it's my forum, it's free and I can tell what ever I want without anyone decide what I have to tell or not on my behalf !!!

PW

What did I mention in another topic? Please bring it up.....you are evading when you say "no time to loose".....You can choose not to respond.....by the way, did I ask you in particular to respond? I have noticed when you find something hard to answer, you guide your coterie by saying "No time" OR "my" wish, "my" choice...you know what, then there is no need for a forum. The aim of comments "No time", "my choice" is to stifle debate and prevent a transparent environment. In that case, don't say I do this and I do that for my fans. I don't want you to show that content which you say you can't.....I was curious to know how it helped to talk about something you can't show.


Rem.

I don't try to escape any discussion until they have a sens for me !!!
I'm in a place where I need to do 17 km to get internet and to paid a lot for answer your question !!! So I don't have time for that kind of steril topics ...

PW

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:I don't try to escape any discussion until they have a sens for me !!!
I'm in a place where I need to do 17 km to get internet and to paid a lot for answer your question !!! So I don't have time for that kind of steril topics ...

PW

I would rather have you spend your precious internet on work, but don't guide others to not respond. Do you fear others outing you on a hard question? Why do you need to jump in?

The inherent virtue of an interactive forum is growth borne out of debate and discussion. If you try to nip that very aspect in the bud, then you basically want a forum that worships, flatters and lauds you.

Rem.

Again you're wrong because if it was like that i will not have answered to you but now this is what I will do !!!

PW