That's what the man said. Proof of it didn't happen.

Interesting to see that this thread is now all about Rose Delight but I am sure she is not the only one who was/is active in private entertainment. I have heard like @darkhorse said that many ‘unexpected’ Woodman girls went into the business. Which does not sound unlogical. I was lucky too.
If you are a producer or whatever then just tell us who you are instead to make stuff up. Just saying because I know alot of people claim to be in this business to do honest work with pornstars. In the end they don't publish anything for 20 years not even 1shoot because what they do is shady work. They pay the girl just to fuck them and make private videos, never to release them. For me that's not the work of a producer or filmmaker, that's just a soliciter.Darkhorse wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 8:16 pmRelax people. I didn't exactly say Rose was escort. I think its important that we keep our facts straight and not try to damage her reputation.In the past I have booked a lot of models for shoots thinking that at some point I would make a website
I have about 60 films in stock going back to 2003, non of which have been released yet, and maybe never will.
. . . . . . I suppose you're putting Pierre in that solicitor category then?JohnWick wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 11:09 amIn the end they don't publish anything for 20 years not even 1shoot because what they do is shady work. They pay the girl just to fuck them and make private videos, never to release them. For me that's not the work of a producer or filmmaker, that's just a soliciter.Darkhorse wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 8:16 pmRelax people. I didn't exactly say Rose was escort. I think its important that we keep our facts straight and not try to damage her reputation.In the past I have booked a lot of models for shoots thinking that at some point I would make a website
I have about 60 films in stock going back to 2003, non of which have been released yet, and maybe never will.
Interesting to see that @darkhorse started a discussion on Under The Radar escorts, naming Rose Delight, talking about his great choice of pornstar escorts and now pretending he is a producer of unknown videos and that ‘we’ should take care of the image of the girls.TopCat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 12:59 pm. . . . . . I suppose you're putting Pierre in that solicitor category then?JohnWick wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 11:09 amIn the end they don't publish anything for 20 years not even 1shoot because what they do is shady work. They pay the girl just to fuck them and make private videos, never to release them. For me that's not the work of a producer or filmmaker, that's just a soliciter.Darkhorse wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 8:16 pmRelax people. I didn't exactly say Rose was escort. I think its important that we keep our facts straight and not try to damage her reputation.In the past I have booked a lot of models for shoots thinking that at some point I would make a website
I have about 60 films in stock going back to 2003, non of which have been released yet, and maybe never will.
He has videos that are 20 years old that have never been/will be published, and many of the girls that have passed through his door have ended up as Escorts. Might not be "shady" but it could be construed as that, I guess.
The lines between legit and suspect can and are very blurred in the porn industry, and you can never be too certain about who could be soliciting or who could be legit.
![]()
I think maybe you should visit an eye specialist who will recommend you some good glasses so you can read properly what I said.TopCat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 12:59 pm
. . . . . . I suppose you're putting Pierre in that solicitor category then?
He has videos that are 20 years old that have never been/will be published, and many of the girls that have passed through his door have ended up as Escorts. Might not be "shady" but it could be construed as that, I guess.
The lines between legit and suspect can and are very blurred in the porn industry, and you can never be too certain about who could be soliciting or who could be legit.
![]()
Oh, my eyes see just fine, 20/20.JohnWick wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 5:11 pmI think maybe you should visit an eye specialist who will recommend you some good glasses so you can read properly what I said.
What Pierre posts is real. Even if he take 10-20 years to upload a video. We know he did the casting, unlike other shady producers who I know for sure is contacting Brillbabes under the premise that they are producer but they are fake individuals with a camera. I know for sure they paid girls but you will never see one video or shoot or any of their work.
Come on guys. You cannot compare Woodman with darkhorse. One is in a professional business, the other is a narcissistic dreamer who makes in a different way use of the girls. It shows that certain fans can go too far and that models - even the nice ones as Rose - often seem to let that happen. One of the poor consequences of working in the porn industry. Maybe there should be a compliance manifest and a qualiy register for model agencies and producers.TopCat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 9:58 pmOh, my eyes see just fine, 20/20.JohnWick wrote: ↑Tue Jul 29, 2025 5:11 pmI think maybe you should visit an eye specialist who will recommend you some good glasses so you can read properly what I said.
What Pierre posts is real. Even if he take 10-20 years to upload a video. We know he did the casting, unlike other shady producers who I know for sure is contacting Brillbabes under the premise that they are producer but they are fake individuals with a camera. I know for sure they paid girls but you will never see one video or shoot or any of their work.
"What Pierre posts is real" Is it? How do you know? Have you ever been there while Pierre shoots? Pierre has used apple juice before instead of real piss (for the model's comfort, of course), but it wasn't real. Pierre has said himself that porn is "Hollywood", so it's not real. It's only as real as you want to believe.
"We know he did the casting" No, you don't. There are "castings" that Pierre has that will never be seen, so you can't say "We know he did the casting," or whether he did it for business or pleasure. By your own words, he could have solicited them. One man's casting is another man's Escort.
You can only imply that the other guy is soliciting if you're willing to imply that Pierre might (or has been) as well.
Now, where are my glasses?
No no no these are your words, not mine. I was simply referring to producers who worked with girls but have no content to show at all. Zero! They are the ones soliciting. Don't twist my words. But it seems you have some ulterior motive here.