Nowadays to be honest I am lost about this war and don't pay attention to it anymore. I just see that Brussels want tax more the europeans citizens in order give more money to Ukrain and continue the war.

I will take my plane back to europe in 3 hours and honestly I wish I could stay on a desert islands some days far from all these politics manipulations !!!

https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1920489384651973102


PW

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: ↑

Thu May 08, 2025 3:27 pm

Nowadays to be honest I am lost about this war and don't pay attention to it anymore. I just see that Brussels want tax more the europeans citizens in order give more money to Ukrain and continue the war.

I will take my plane back to europe in 3 hours and honestly I wish I could stay on a desert islands some days far from all these politics manipulations !!!

https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1920489384651973102


Capture d’écran 2025-05-08 à 17.26.19.png


PW

The united West will always support and develop these conflicts because it needs resources, energy and dominant position in the world economy to have privileges and at the same time to contain competitors!!!!
Only another total defeat and resignation to its position can stop it.
Capitalist economy requires a constant infusion of new resources and energy. The West does not have them in sufficient quantity, and “the West” will look for them by any means.
Russia also has its own interests, namely to protect itself from the claims and aggression of the “West”. And it will not give up its plans. Ukraine, unfortunately, is just a bargaining chip. And it will remain so as long as there is a conflict of interests.
I have already told you that the Third World War is beginning its development, and its progress and apogee is only a matter of time. From the world history we know that any crisis of capitalism led to world wars and distribution of resources and spheres of influence. Now there is also a crisis of capitalism. Only with modern means of mass destruction, mankind may not survive the Third World War. And it will not necessarily develop in Ukraine, now there are many hotbeds of tension in the world. It can be the Middle East (Iran-Israel), it can be Central-South Asia (India-Pakistan). The collective West will inevitably provoke a global conflict by its actions.

Something tells me this conflict will end soon. I'm betting November

Oui c'est dommage effectivement qu'il ne vienne pas mais c'est selon moi dans la logique Russe de se dire que tant que les occidentaux ne sont prêts à garantir la non présence de l'OTAN en Ukraine les discussion ne servent à rien.
Pour autant son prétexte par rapport à la non légitimité de Zelensly est invalide puisque la loi de son pays l'autorise à rester en place.
Bref le chat qui se mord la queue et on est pas pret de voir la fin de cette guerre si les gens des deux cotés jouent à ça !!!


PW

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: ↑

Thu May 15, 2025 1:28 am

Pour autant son prétexte par rapport à la non légitimité de Zelensly est invalide puisque la loi de son pays l'autorise à rester en place.

PW

Not true!!!
You are either making it up, or you are mindlessly repeating the lies of the Western propaganda again, instead of trying to figure it out for yourself!
The main law of Ukraine is its Constitution!
No by-law can contradict the Constitution!

In Ukraine, a decision was made on the so-called extension of Vladimir Zelensky's powers as president. This decision was made on the basis of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine of May 12, 2015, 389-VIII “On the legal regime of martial law” (Law on Martial Law) and the Electoral Code of Ukraine.
But this is a subordinate act, and it contradicts the main law of the country, which legally should not be.
The Constitution of Ukraine does not provide for the possibility of such “extension” in respect of a person holding the office of the President of Ukraine, even during the period of martial law. Meanwhile, the Constitution of Ukraine provides for the extension of the powers of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine - in case their term expires during martial law or state of emergency (Article 83). At the same time, once again, there is no provision in the Constitution on the possibility of “extending” the powers of the President of Ukraine in this way.
There is a very important principle in constitutional law - the principle of subsidiarity. It means that in order to resolve a certain issue a relevant level of regulation should be applied - corresponding to the nature of the regulated issue and the nature of the level of regulation. Therefore, constitutions, as a rule, regulate the most important political-legal issues, fundamental legal principles, and subordinate legislation - issues of procedural realization of rights established by the Constitution and laws, technical requirements, instructions, etc.

In the case of the powers of the President of Ukraine: the constitutional legislator in the Constitution of Ukraine regulated the issue of extension of powers on the basis of martial law only in relation to the Verkhovna Rada. There is no such constitutional norm with regard to the President!

From the Constitution of Ukraine....

Article 103 states: “The President of Ukraine is elected by the citizens of Ukraine on the basis of universal, equal and direct suffrage by secret ballot for a term of five years”. The CC found that the provision of Article 103 of the Constitution and other articles defining the constitutional-legal status of the President does not contain norms that would establish another term of office other than five years.

Article 112 specifies: “Execution of the duties of the President of Ukraine for the period until the election and assumption of office of the new President of Ukraine shall be entrusted to the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine”.

Article 157 puts an end to the situation: “The Constitution of Ukraine may not be amended in conditions of martial law or state of emergency”!!!

Thus, legally, the duties of the Head of State of Ukraine, should have passed to the Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Stefanchuk!

OK thanks Vitaly I did some research and got this :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Ukra ... en%20after


PW

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: ↑

Thu May 15, 2025 7:10 am

OK thanks Vitaly I did some research and got this :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Ukra ... en%20after


PW

Again the link to Wikipedia.....
As usual, the author of the article selectively indicated a particular article, and apparently “forgot” about the rest!
You cited the article about the possibility of early termination of powers of the President of Ukraine.
I wrote you everything in detail with references to the Constitution of Ukraine!
https://konstitutsiyaua.ru/konstitutsiyaua-ru-rus.pdf
1). In the Constitution of Ukraine there is no possibility to extend the term of powers of the President of Ukraine, even under martial law!
2). There is no prohibition in the Constitution of Ukraine to hold elections of the President of Ukraine, even under martial law!
The by-law adopted by the Verkhovna Rada on the inability to hold elections under martial law contradicts the Constitution of the country. Any lawyer will tell you that it should not be!!!
3). In the Constitution of Ukraine, it is clearly stated to whom the powers of the President should be transferred at the end of his term of office!

And most importantly: Article 157 puts an end to the situation: “The Constitution of Ukraine may not be amended in conditions of martial law or state of emergency”!!!

What else is not clear???

Même des experts français compétents et impartiaux vous disent que Zelensky est un président illégitime depuis un an...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erWSAvSrAfE