PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:I'm always surprised how people react sometime when facing the problem of what they did ! I understand maybe this photographer was unfair if he said it was for a regular mag and put thoses pictures everywhere on the net, but also it's like when a girl come in the room with me, said no, no ; no and then maybe and then YES ! Sign a release take my money and few month later send me an email asking if I can remove her video because she was "naive" !!!
It's a bit easy also ... !!! Why the girl with who I live since almost 10 years doesn't let me approach her and went back home without I can do anything ???
Do not always think they are right when they complain ...
PW
Well... nobody is saying that.
Just, it's a bit useless to do compare in the void. No one knows this girl (the one on the pics, and possibly the one behind "Kate"), so who knows if she sign anything ?
Anyway, even a contract can be broken (generaly with money compensation). Even if this girl was disoriented enough to do something, it doesn't mean that she have to accept to become a star of pornsite. Forgive me but most of the pics I saw aren't very compatible even for a mag use. But even if they were contracted for that use, Kate haven't asked nothing. Just told us that pics are edited (partly faked), that she don't want to do porn and would just like to not become a object of weird cult.
To me, she's complaing only about the photographer who cheated her. Maybe it's not true, who knows ? But how to compare with girls you had under contract and made you trouble few years after ? Miss perfection is not an old Woodman's girl. Maybe she's dishonest and maybe not. Why to not simply talk about YOUR girls on YOUR forum, and stop speculations about supposed liars, conspiracies and all what you want about girls nobody's really know ?
Question was : can you, Pierre, get this girl ? Her comment sounds to be "no, I'm not interested".
Those who are so involved in the "truth" about "miss perfection" can try to find an official contract she signed that said she was ok to do porn, to be assfucked by the spider and see her pics everywhere on the net.
And even in that case, be ok with me to admit that we all have the right to change our mind. Remember the wife of your son. She's now special to you, and all the contracts she could have been signed will not change the fact that you are ok to give her the peace she and her husband want now, no ? And no one on that forum is complaining about that.
Personaly, for example, I don't care if a girl say yes 100x before to say no. The time she says no means no, and it's this no that makes a judge decide between a rape or no.
It's funny how an unreal pic can turns the heads. Isn't there any good content on that site without this miss ?
