HELENA CATOIR wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 4:34 pmHi people!
You may, or may not, know that I'm the wife of Dennis Burkas.
Somehow after all this time I felt the need to post a message on here to explain some things....
Before reading this, know that everything I say is true and I have evidence or I witnessed with my own eyes.
First of all Woodman is NOT an associate but just a friend.
Since I know Dennis for some years now, even before we had a relationship, I saw a lot of girls passing by Dennis asking him to make them famous in porn. Since Dennis doesn't make porn himself since quite a few years he is not the one who can make them famous but he can help. Dennis and Pierre know each other since 2006 and are good friends. Both have their business and businessmodel. Since a lot of girls asked Dennis to fix something for them to make them famous porn (they already were in porn or wanted to be in it - they were all above 18 y/o) Dennis introduced them to Pierre and then Pierre decided if he was interested. At all times there was a (casual) videochat between Dennis, the girl and Pierre or just Pierre and the girl. No one took money from eachother for this. Pierre didn't pay Dennis for the girl or vice versa. The only one who received money was the girl when she did the casting for Pierre (since it's a scene they make, the girl get paid obviously). With this the girl could be launched in porn and earned money, Pierre had a new girl to make a scene with and Dennis didn't need anything since he only did it with a few girls because he believed they were good people and just wanted to help. In the end it's just passing a contact and doing a video call, Pierre still decided is he was interested but that's it. Very simple.
Trixxxie and Nanoe were both one of those girls Dennis wanted to help. Nanoe was already an OnlyFans model and wanted to become more famous. Trixxxie had already started porn with various Deutch / Belgians productions and wanted to become more famous in porn. They both did a videochat with Pierre. Nanoe with Pierre together with Dennis and Trixxxie with Pierre without Dennis because she only got his phone by Dennis and contacted Pierre directly.
Pierre has a strong opinion on this situation happening now since he knew the girls when they were both still in contact with Dennis and know how they talked about him and then after they broke contact with Dennis. Pierre still has the complete whatsapp chats from the girls since the beginning and the least we can say about that that their messages are odd when looking at the dates they were send and the dates they gave to police they were 'raped' by Dennis.
Piere himself has been victim of comparable situation with girls in the past and know how easy it is to make those allegations against someone.
About the childpornography and pedo shit;
Dennis was never convicted for pedophilia. That's a fact. And it's punishable by law to call someone a pedophile when he was never convicted for it. Dennis was convicted for sexual intercourse with minors but they are not so black and white as it seems.
I can tell that he was convicted with doubt twice. In Belgium it's possible to be convicted without evidence and while the judge has no evidence to convict you, he can say "I have no evidence but I still convict you". That's what happened in 2 cases with minors.
In another case a mom came to Dennis literally selling her daughter as hooker but she was 17 (turning 18 in 2 or 3 months). The girl in person wanted it to so there was consent! Afterwards a discussion arrived between the mom and Dennis and the mom sued Dennis for raping her daughter. The mom only mentioned at the time of the complaint the daughter was not yet above 18 and Dennis didn't know before because both girls said she was 18. And to be honest, a girl of 17 and 10 months or a girl of 18 have the same body. Dennis got convicted for rape of a minor and the mom also got punished and got 1 year jail time.
In the case happening now Dennis got convicted for a video on a phone which is not his! The girl the phone belong to went twice to police to say it's her phone. Police wrote it down, twice. And judge denied this statement of the girl and convicted Dennis for possession of childpornography. Also in this case Dennis got convicted for pictures of girls who LOOK minors but they are above 18 on the moment the picture was taken! The law they used for this is an old law in Belgium that makes the possession of videos and pictures of people who look like minors but aren't punishable as childpornography.... We are not talking about kids of 5 or 6 years old, we are talking about girls who look 16 or 17 but are in fact 18 and above!
Feel free to give your opinion but know that not me or Pierre would support someone who rapes minors or adults, and certainly no pedofiles!
Pierre is also in possession of official court documents I send him because he deserved to know what this all is about.
I hope you all can leave Pierre alone on this matter and can respect his opinion because he knows more about this case then you do because he is a witness himself and this is why he has the opinion that he has.
I hope people will respect Pierre as a witness and will start to look to this case in a different way because Pierre doesn't say some things to defend Dennis but because all he has knows it's true.
Know that I'm not blindly supporting my husband, but I'm supporting the truth because I witnessed the truth.
Alot of people (will) call me stupid but I don't care. I read ALL court files of Dennis, I collected and still collect the evidence for this trial and have it all on this computer, I made sure that already now 4 people will testify in court saying what the truth is because they also witnessed it and more will come! Dennis might be in jail at this time but I still keep fighting for the truth.
I did some interviews with Belgian press and showed them all the evidence I have at this point and that's why they support me (and Dennis) because even them can't believe what's happening.
Thanks for taking the time to read my post and if you have any questions feel free to ask them, I will be happy to respond as complete and correct as possible.
Kiss
Helena
Creampie wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 5:50 pmWell Mrs Catoir it is very strange that you opened an account here the moment this thread start to blow up as if you were already on it. If you are indeed the real wife. Shouldn't you be trying to convince more the court about Dennis' innocence instead of people here on a forum?
Secondly the point you're trying to make about a 17 year old wanting it...? when she is still underage. I cannot fathom how ridiculous this is and how anyone can still think this is acceptable and used an excuse for what he did.
He is an adult! What that girls mother and Dennis did is punishable by law but you're out here saying that calling someone a paedophile is punishable. It's ridiculous.
We understand he's your husband but when so many women have been involved I can't help but think you should be protecting the women and not coming to your husbands defense after all that has transpired.
When Weinsteins crimes became public, his wife felt the pain of those women, she never took the side of her husband who committed such crimes because she knew it was wrong.
Now we understand that Pierre has become entangled in all this and he has nothing to do with any of it, but for you to say he is a witness is absolute BS. He was not there when Denis was committing his own crimes and has no proof of what Denis did and did not do.
The video of Trixxie explaining her situation and of other girls who said the same about Denis cannot be blatantly ignored. Denis has to face the music unfortunately and you standing by his side only implicates you even further.
Well I think Helena is in a difficult situation with her husband in jail and I can understand also she wants to give her opinion.
Thanks Creampie to understand it's difficult for me to be seat down on two chairs at the same time and keep neutral is a very hard exercice in such conditions.
Because the Britshit try now to say I was an associate of Dennis and responsible for what happened to those girls !!!Hector wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 6:08 pmBut why you tell us this? It's Denis case and not Pierre's, no?HELENA CATOIR wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 4:34 pm
First of all Woodman is NOT an associate but just a friend.
First of all I know only 2 on 8 and second I was never an associate of Dennis and never have had any business with him.
PW
a lot of surprises to come for those involved but they will see because I'm not going to throw our defense online. And be sure, it will go very hard.
and if Pierre is Dennis friend and witness then no problem he can testify in court and free Dennis. Pointless talking here because your husband is in the jail. Take your evidence to court and free him instead make excuses here.
