In reality the hotel room is more intimist and better psychologycaly for relax than a studio with all lights !!!
But at same time the studio is looking more professional so both option have plus and minus ...

PW

Lupino wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 20, 2022 6:07 am

On the contrary. Girls feel more comfortable where they are less apprehensive. They don't want to feel like they having sex like a cheap escort in some hotel room where they also have to worry about noises coming from the room etc. Girls hold back in these settings.

I'd politely suggest that there are a HUGE number of casting and WUNF scenes that would suggest otherwise. And that put the typical studio scene shot for other sites to shame. Although I suspect a notable contribution to the latter is the number of people around as an audience rather than purely the room.

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 20, 2022 7:04 am

In reality the hotel room is more intimist and better psychologycaly for relax than a studio with all lights !!!
But at same time the studio is looking more professional so both option have plus and minus ...

At the heart of my original post is that personally I really value how you combine professional recording quality with the rawness and intimacy of more amateur footage. For me there is a point where 'professional' steps too far away from this and just looks staged/fake though. Yes of course all porn essentially is but what I want a director to do as much as possible is to convince me I'm watching real sex not a show.

For me where a decision has to be made between looking 'more professional' or more like 'real sex' I would always personally lean towards the latter. Although not actually one of your own scenes I have commented before that I think Holly Viya's XXXX scene is superb for its sense of lust and rawness for example. I know the visual quality of scene isn't up to the standard you'd normally want but I'm just giving an example of where looking 'more professional' isn't necessarily the highest priority.

https://www.woodmancastingx.com/casting ... 29137.html

Others will absolutely feel totally different but equally I doubt I'm alone is this type of thinking. It sounds like you very much intend to keep a mix of styles though which I'm sure commercially makes total sense, and different consumers will prefer different things. As discussion in this thread has already demonstrated.

Ultra wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 20, 2022 12:15 pm

For me there is a point where 'professional' steps too far away from this and just looks staged/fake though. Yes of course all porn essentially is but what I want a director to do as much as possible is to convince me I'm watching real sex not a show.

For me where a decision has to be made between looking 'more professional' or more like 'real sex' I would always personally lean towards the latter.

Considering you have only made 30 posts here and are new I doubt you have been here long enough to even watch enough of Pierre's videos for you to be entitled to say what is professional and what is not here

JohnWick wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 20, 2022 12:41 pm

Ultra wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 20, 2022 12:15 pm

For me there is a point where 'professional' steps too far away from this and just looks staged/fake though. Yes of course all porn essentially is but what I want a director to do as much as possible is to convince me I'm watching real sex not a show.

For me where a decision has to be made between looking 'more professional' or more like 'real sex' I would always personally lean towards the latter.

Considering you have only made 30 posts here and are new I doubt you have been here long enough to even watch enough of Pierre's videos for you to be entitled to say what is professional and what is not here

I have been a member previously as well. Either way, I have however watched a large amount of porn from various producers over the last 25-30 years so I don't feel somehow underqualified . In case it wasn't clear, my points above were general not exclusively relating to Pierre's scenes, but highlighting where for me their strengths lay vs the competition.

The most outstanding feature of Pierre Woodman is the natural factor that he puts to his productions.
Unfortunately, whenever you put CG Background its kills the natural flow of the video.

Honestly I was wondering why you put it if it does mean more work; maybe hotel owners give you problems??

It's not about hotel management it's about having a better light because I am really tired with the grey in winter or a full raining day in summer !!!
It's also easier for me to shoot this way but obviously more complicate in post production.
I'm thinking move my studio to another place with a specific room for the casting and keep the green wall for some XXXX.

PW

I'm miss your Productions in the pure Nature ,i like the Casting scene with Ally Breelsen & Julie Skylight in the nature and wish you do more scenes in the Nature in the Future

Personally I don’t like these green screen backgrounds. It looks to artificial to me. Next step could me changing actresses for avatars. The style of PW is real life gonzo. Every change is not necessarily an improvement.

I also don´t like these backgrounds For me the casting or scene is much more "real" if it is in a hotel Room/Bed. I don´t have any Problems, if the Light sometimes is not so perfect. In real Life the Light is also not always perfect And the Girl seem much more like "a Girl next door".

And last but not least, the whole atmosphere is something else in a Hotel room with the Hotel Background. Somebody could hear the moanings, Boyfriend is waiting in the Lobby, etc. In a Studio its much more "sterile"

OK I listen you all and will do my best in this direction ...

PW