Hello Mr. Woodman,

I tried to send you a message privately, but I suppose that the feature is not functioning.

I am a big fan of your work and feel that there are a some important lessons to be learned by how you deal with women. I feel that your methods would be very interesting for our audience that is intrigued by the male/femaile dynamic. I am involved with the longest running "seduction newsletter", Cliff's List, which has been publishing advice and discussions regarding seducing women for over ten years (http://www.cliffslist.com/archives).

We would very much like to interview you and have you discuss your work and philosophy for our audience. We would be able to do it all via email (or on your discussion board with the back and forth on a specific thread, which might be fun for other readers to participate!) and you would of course have to approve the finished product prior to our sending it out. Our list has thousands of subscribers around the world and we know that this would expose your work and your website to a large and receptive audience.

Thank you for considering this request.

Cesare Cardinali
joseph@cliffslist.com
cesare_cardinali@hotmail.com

Hi Cesare!

Do you want my method to deal with girls?

1/4 bottle of vodka mixed with orange
3 glasses of wisky-cola
1 glass of gin tonic

= Result : Date with the most pretty girl of the club or K.O. by her boy-friend.

I don't know if there is a specific method to deal with girls but If someone got it he would sell it again gold!

Ah Ah ! I was just thinking about that ! Strangely, a google search for "Pierre Woodman + PUA" doesn't come back with a lot a answers while he's arguably one of the best. And the one thing that you never see with other PUAs is the sex part (but do I really want to see Neil Strauss in action ?). And there's a lot to be said about the sex part (not only about his technique but about the way he behaves).

Anyway, I hope PW answers you wuestion Cesare, but he generally seems more interested in sharing general considerations about women rather than specific analysis about the way he manipulates the girls.


A few things I have noted about his castings:


At first he asks the girl to take the porn magazines and to check them (generally the girl just look at the first pages, but he specifically ask her to keep going). It's important that the girl is the actor here: _she_ is the one checking a porn mag in front of a man asking her questions about sex. That's generally the first psychological step (The interview is basically a psychological escalation ladder).

He often uses negs: for example when the girl says she wants to be a model, he generally says that she's too small. When the girl tries to mentally escape and doesn't want to formulate why she's in this room, he confront her with the reality of the situation , specifically why she came to see him (since most of the time, she knows what PW's job is, even if she refuses to admit it to herself).

He frequently qualifies himself as a man with a big experience who has met a lot of girls: paradoxally, the fact that sex is his job is a plus for him since he doesn't appear as a pervert trying to get laid. In this context, the girl is the one having an unusual experience (note how he frequently qualifies the situation as "normal").

He's the king of shit tests: Everytime a girl comes to the point where she's not listening to his arguments and doesn't want to play his little mind game anymore (and sometimes is ready to leave the room), he usually doesn't answer or continues with a slighlty different thought but most of all, he just keeps on like he didn't care what she said. The same goes when a girl tries to qualify herself, like when she says she knows she's beautiful: he generally acts like he hasn't heard her (see Britney's casting for that).

His voice is generally deep and energetic, He laughs frequently, sometimes at the expense of the girl but he never goes too far. Note how often he says YES during the interviews.

He basically never apologises whatever the dialogue or the situation: That is Alpha !

The striptease escalation part:
- the girl has to take off her personal clothes _in front of him_: she could go to the bathroom and comme back naked but his control over here wouldn't be as important.
- the girl has to stand naked and make a full circle so that no part of her body can be hidden (note how during this part he doesn't move: he is the spectator, she is his pupppet); the girl is completely vulnerable here.
- the climax is when she has to go on the couch doggy style shwowing her ass while smiling at the camera: while the precedents positions were "normal", that one is clearly sexual: it's almost as if the sex part has already begun: what can the girl say after that ?


Anyway, there's a lot to be said, but I kneed to get laid ... in my bed, so later....

I really hope he'll reply too. We're all really psyched to learn more about his philosophy. It all came about when I was watching an old Casting from 1998 on VHS and PW spent a good 20 mins talking to the girl and she kept resisting, at one point almost leaving the hotel room. She apparently only had one boyfriend, never gives blow jobs, and doesn't like the sperm. LOL

Next scene, PW is removing the magazines from the bed, she comes out of the shower and it's go time, with a money shot in her mouth at the end. I was fascinated by how he pulled it off.

Hopefully it'll work out, we are entirely free and don't charge for any of the newsletters, so it's all for the betterment of manking (and women). I love how he asks each girl "Tu aimes les garcons gentils ou mechants?" and they always say "gentils" and then they are getting gang banged by baddesses. ))

Cesare Cardinali wrote:I really hope he'll reply too. We're all really psyched to learn more about his philosophy. It all came about when I was watching an old Casting from 1998 on VHS and PW spent a good 20 mins talking to the girl and she kept resisting, at one point almost leaving the hotel room. She apparently only had one boyfriend, never gives blow jobs, and doesn't like the sperm. LOL

Next scene, PW is removing the magazines from the bed, she comes out of the shower and it's go time, with a money shot in her mouth at the end. I was fascinated by how he pulled it off.

Hopefully it'll work out, we are entirely free and don't charge for any of the newsletters, so it's all for the betterment of manking (and women). I love how he asks each girl "Tu aimes les garcons gentils ou mechants?" and they always say "gentils" and then they are getting gang banged by baddesses. ))

Let me react on your last something... Usually the girls, like bad boys! Check it out, download few more castings pls.! Don't make a decision about few ones!!!

Cesare, I was on your website, I have no problem with an interview, we can do it via skype or write me here : woodman.prod@yahoo.com
But let me tell you, you're wrong about the girl "men style" ! More than 90 % says : I prefer bad boy !

Viktor 666, I must said your analyse is good !!! Of course you have seen some of the trick I use during my job ! It's not so difficult but not everyone take time to understand my "mecanic" at work... You did it, it's cool !

Booz, I'm sure your method works very well, but... you understand me I think !!!

Yes Ricardo, I met Amirah and we agree about "something" which will stay secret for the moment. As you know she's a good girl and I respect her a lot...

PW

PW quel nom sur skype?

Oh là ! Reste souple amigo, j'ai déjà pas beaucoup de vie privée, et pour le moment je ne donne pas mon Skype à tout le monde... Ca se comprend non ?

PW

Those 90% of girls who say bad-boy are girls who aren't really educated and aren't really lady-like and some are just too gullible and too young to know what they want.

Now girls who are educated, intelligent, open minded, and who have brains of being Accountants, Doctors, Lawyers and respectful of their Parents want sweet boys or gentlemens. That's real-lady-like behaviour. Those 90% don't represent Female population of the world. Or mayb they mean bad-boy in bed? but yeah most of these girls are poor girls, haven't really been brought up with education and plus they are mostly eastern-European who are not the most poshest and civlized people in world.

And also if you are just sweet and charming and have wits then u don't need to try too hard to seduce. Sorry but if your really old and unattractive and fat then you will need more then seduction skills lol. I know for sure if I did what pierre does by bringing girls to hotel and persuading them to have sex with me then I can assure u I would not have to talk with them so much as Pierre does. I've had sex with prettier girls then these without any too much seduction at all. Maybe my looks and intelligence works on them? or my diversity and versatility as I can adapt to any girl. But I would never shag dirty immoral girls. That's why no girl has never played me or used me for money, like some to do with Pierre. If girls really like u and find u attractive they would never be a bitch to u and run away and take ur money lol.

You know Tyrone, it's easy to speak hidden behind an avatar on a forum. I know a lot of handsome boys with money who are not able to catch girls as I do ! It's not so simple as you said to fuck girls after less than an hour you know them and also you're wrong about who is a " good serious girl " very educated and who is not ! I meet all social categories during the year and except the age who more or less always between 18 and 30 y.o, they are all from diverses level of life. Do not forget Gabriella Tchekan was a doctor in Bratislava hospital and Cherry Jul has one of the highest graduation in biology from one of the best Russian school, and I can give you 100 of similar sample !!!
To like bad boys doesn't come from education but simply from the fact womens love feel the man near of them is strong ! Of course some girls ( like my daughter for instance ) prefer romantic style, but they represent only 1/10 of them !!!

PW