A question on POV for other members and Pierre.

I was a fan from the start when Pierre first came with his "initations" for Private Castings. I ve allways been a huge fan of the original format. "The fly on the wall",
"the hidden camera" format.

The POV as a format was introduce a few years back with Meg Laren,
and is now today totally standard in Castingx hard.

As a fan I must be in BIG BIG BIG time minority in my "prefered taste" on the site?
because when I looked back on the recent 100 castingx hard, 86 % had a POV cumshot ending. And just 5 % had the "old" hidden camera view when it was cumshot.

I get it! it is 2017 and many many fans seems to prefer POV endings instead of Pierre s old style.
I know for Pierre it is alot of "parameters" he needs to think about all the time. And the use of POV easier "trandcend" a private initation into a "porn scene" that a girl can sign a model realese for. I m just asking for a little more variations. For instance 80-20 % in favor of POV cumshot endings??

For me a cumshot ending is far more sexy and erotic when you see a wide view of the girl entirely and especially when she is finish a guy off herself...

That use to be higlights to see girls like Angel, Gina Devine, Mea Melone,Rebbeca and others sucking Pierre off to climax with a wider angel with the camera and not POV.

I have a solution for that to make everyone happy but then it means double work and hide two cameras instead of one ... but I will make a try at least once soon !!!

PW

Cette question a souvent lieu et effectivement chacun ces goûts, difficile de contenter tout le monde.
Je pense que Pierre le fait comme s'est expliqué pour plaire à tout le monde mais aussi surtout pour pouvoir faire signer plus facilement les initiations qui peuvent alors s'apparenter à une scène, de plus la fille ayant vu la caméra ne se sent pas "trahie" après coup.
Pierre lui aussi doit préférer les anciens castings dans le sens qu'à l'époque il baisait les filles le plus naturellement possible, sans se soucier de la caméra et il prenait forcément plus de plaisir.
Ensuite j'entrevois la solution de Pierre, cad filmer toujours en partie en POV mais si la release pour l'initiation est signé, il peut alors diffuser l'intégralité de la scène avec la caméra caché, sans utiliser la partie POV. Il faudrait bien sur que la fille accepte cela dans tous les cas et alors il pourrait même proposer un casting en caméra fixe intégrale et un autre en POV intégrale ou en partie en tout cas.

PIERRE WOODMAN wrote:I have a solution for that to make everyone happy but then it means double work and hide two cameras instead of one ... but I will make a try at least once soon !!!

PW

If you can do that it sounds great, but I don't want you do double work.
It's hard for you allready!!

BUT can I Please ask for just SOME variations when you do your cumshots?
Today it's mainly POV orgasm for you, with you jerking yourself of and girl lick your
balls.

I'm just asking to add in:
*Orgasm for you in 69 position
* Wide range camera angel when you have orgasm "fucking"a girls mouth
(Like in Anna Morna and Arabella Danger but without POV)

Can you do that?
Not all people like POV but nowadays the site is in HUGE favor
for POV lovers.
Just some more "variation" would be appreciated

Thank you

I will try not forget !!!

PW

Thank you

les plans en plein action on une vertu que n'avait pas les anciens castings , au moins on voit bien les sodos , avant on pouvait avoir des doutes , le model pouvait mentir ou arranger les choses comme elle voulait car on ne voyait rien durant des séquences entières !

C'est aussi mon avis !!!

PW

Personally I am not a fan of POV.
It kills a little bit the innocent, natural aspect. Especially in an initiation/casting. In 2nd, third scenes , WUNF etc. it does less harm the psychological effect.
But yes, les gouts et les couleurs ...

liabatyd

ps: I never had any doubt PW took them in the ass in the older scenes. They almost all have reverse cowgirl moments where you can see it all