Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Pierre Woodman is one of the biggest porn maker of the world. Ask him everything you want to knows about girls and porn business. Hot News inside.
daba52
Guru
Posts: 1826
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: USA

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by daba52 »

Thankful for my Architectural engineering courses which included the study of physics, construction and materials...no doubts in my mind...WTC was never designed to be a furnace flue directing heat and conflagration up NOT out, but that is what it became. The exterior shell stabilized and contained the structure until the internal structure weakened catastrophically.

Gravity is a straight down force. Weight falling from approximately 1,300 feet would take about 9 seconds...t = √[2y/g] = √[2*1300/32.2] = 8.986 sec Simply put gravity accelerates at 32ft/sec*2 until terminal velocity is reached...roughly 120mph.

Trust this can ease the concerns re: WTC. :) :geek: :geek:

User avatar
Eintracht
Guru
Posts: 1837
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:38 am

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by Eintracht »

There are some weird topics here ... wait for somebody posting if how his poop was in the morning. :lol:
“You cannot blame porn, ... When I was young, I used to masturbate to Gilligan's Island.” - Ron Jeremy

Curious George
Guru
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:48 am

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by Curious George »

Eintracht wrote:There are some weird topics here ... wait for somebody posting if how his poop was in the morning. :lol:
As a Sophomore in high school, we had to read Cicero. One story that he told, was a time when an orator was speaking at the Forum. Other Senators did not like what he said.
So one of them took a chamber pot and dumped "stercus" on his head.

It was rare for Roman literature to contain vulgar words, but there is plenty of it as graffiti on the walls of Pompei. :D

daba52
Guru
Posts: 1826
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: USA

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by daba52 »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Eintracht wrote:There are some weird topics here ... wait for somebody posting if how his poop was in the morning. :lol:

User avatar
PIERRE WOODMAN
The Spider
Posts: 97312
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:48 pm
Location: All
Contact:

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by PIERRE WOODMAN »

:D :D :D

PW
"For 16 years WCX is a fortress resisting the changes of the internet and the hatred of morons.Thanks to the fans having always supported me but also those discovering me today. It's together that we will go the furthest !!!"

doxxx
Guru
Posts: 2914
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:38 am
Contact:

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by doxxx »

ragingboner wrote:
fum01 wrote:One question:
Did the Moonlanding in 1969 with Neil Armstrong realy happen or was it just a hoax (fake) filmed in a studion on earth?

I don't think that there was a man on the moon ever.
What is your opinion?
A completely stupid question. Ironically the technology needed to fake the moon landing simply DID NOT EXIST at the time. Photoshopping or movie editors did not exist. Meanwhile, the rocket technology did. And inumerable people including physicists has calculated everything to make sure everything regarding the missions add up, and it does.
Question stupid? Then can you explain why the moon has not gone anymore?

Curious George
Guru
Posts: 1211
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:48 am

Re: Moonlanding - Reality or Hoax?

Post by Curious George »

Back to the London tower fire.

The renovations to the building included cladding made of aluminum with styrofoam inside. It is very flammable, and the manufacturer says "Never use it in buildings more that three stories high". Evidently the construction crew did not read the directions. Also when it burns, it gives off cyanide gas.

And I thought I lived in a death trap. :roll:

Post Reply