ANETTA KEYS

makker · Post by **makker** » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:40 pm

Putzo wrote:
makker wrote:Anyway, so what difference does it make? You had her ass and did a classic casting!!
In my opinion, I think Pierre doesn't like the idea that he doesn't have the only Anetta Keys DP ever in the history of porn. Honestly, it would bug me too, but there you have it.

Maybe Anetta lied to Pierre that she had never done a dp and he had to pay some large amount of money to her for this "first" dp. I would be kinda frustated too.

Putzo · Post by **Putzo** » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:44 pm

makker wrote:Maybe Anetta lied to Pierre that she had never done a dp and he had to pay some large amount of money to her for this "first" dp. I would be kinda frustated too.

Ooooo, I hadn't thought of that. Good point!

makker · Post by **makker** » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:53 pm

I checked the date of those photos. They were shot in January 2002 (she just turned 18 in November 2001).

Pierre did his casting on April 26, 2002. So these photos were def. before!

From her very first photo shoot:

and her first toys dp:

Putzo · Post by **Putzo** » Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:56 am

The DP photo is the one I had posted, that Pierre took down right away.

Thanks for the confirmation!

PIERRE WOODMAN · Post by **PIERRE WOODMAN** » Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:29 pm

When I use a logiciel about picture history i get this about the creation date :
Canon/eos10/obt.sp:125.Ovir:5.6/date:2003/03/09-9:42:07
So I think she did it later ... and by the way it's obvious because her skin became bad at the end of 2002 after we fight and I fired her because she was using drugs which was destroying her face ...
At both casting interview you can see she was with a perfect face !!!

PW

makker · Post by **makker** » Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:40 pm

Pierre, I got the date from the site where they are hosted january 2002. Why should they lie about that? I have seen a lot of pix of Anetta and these pix are surely not of 2003 (she looked quite different at that time).

Well anyway, Anetta got famous because of you..

PIERRE WOODMAN · Post by **PIERRE WOODMAN** » Tue Jun 25, 2013 4:23 pm

What a fuck ??? I know Anetta much better than 99% of the people in this business and it's Paul Markam who did those pictures for sure not in 2002 because in 2002 she did not worked with anyone in soft without I give my approbation !!!
We fight after the Venus Berlin in November 2002 and then she started to shoot with everyone and did some hardcore photo and video with her BF for DDF.
So do not push with this again, it makes me angry when people are not able to understand the evidences ...

PW

Putzo · Post by **Putzo** » Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:57 pm

Hey Pierre, sorry if we made you angry, buddy. That was not our intention. We're just trying to have a discussion about something we're interested in.

Now, I think we can all agree that the photos are Anetta and not someone else, right?

Here is one photo (top) and one paul markham photo (bottom). Same nose and tongue piercings:

Okay, so now look at her back. In the photo (top), no tattoo. In the paul markham photo (bottom), the tattoo is there. So, the euro nudes photos must be older. She had also lost some weight, got a tan and looked generally better when she shot for paul:

Anyway, hopefully this all makes sense. Again, sorry if we pissed you off, you're still the man and we love your work.

PIERRE WOODMAN · Post by **PIERRE WOODMAN** » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:29 pm

My friend, she did the tatoo at end of 2006 ... and Markam never shoot her with it as far I know !!!
Watch her casting 1 and 2 and then you can understand who was Anetta in 2002 ...

PW

Putzo · Post by **Putzo** » Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:44 pm

Huh... weird. Here is another photo from the same paul markham set as above, .
You can see anal dildo AND the back tattoo. You can remove the image if you want to, I just wanted you to see it:

ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS

Re: ANETTA KEYS