Are ALL those Unreleased 'First' Initiations over hyped?

Pierre woodman is one of the biggest porn maker of the world. Ask him everything you want to knows about girls and porn business. Hot News inside.
Post Reply
toddjames198329
Guru
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 11:33 pm

Are ALL those Unreleased 'First' Initiations over hyped?

Post by toddjames198329 »

Yo Pierre, I realize now that you have ALOT of unreleased initiations/hard anal sex castings. I just read the old Kitty Jane thread, what a shame we'll never see her first 'true' anal initiation.

I accept & respect that some of the girls don't want the footage online for various reasons.

my question is this - how would you grade/rate some of these unreleased initiations ? Are they all that great compared to what's on the site already? are we really missing anything?

U ALRADY have hard anal castings that are as LEGNEDARY. (Jennifer Stone, Angel Dark, Silvia Sinn, Chloe Amour, etc.,) there so many epic anal initations/hard anal deflowerings you've filmed over the past 20-30 yrs that i loose count sometimes!!! its too many to count.

but what about all those unreleased 'first' initiations.. Cherry Kiss, Bettina Cox, Kitty Jane (Jana B), Lucy Belle, Cathy Anderson etc.,- i have a feeling these unreleased initiations were good/great but nothing to write home about. agreed? more like the typical good/great type of stuff that's one the site already but nothing volcanic happening. nothing legendary.

or do you say to yourself " Damn! this is some of the best raw anal footage i've ever filmed, the members will NEVER see it"

I used to get frustrated with those castings where there's a great pre-interview and then an EDIT and then a post sex chat. but i now accept that its a case of I just wasn't meant to see what just happened it is what it is..and i move on.

Post Reply