Woodman Forum - chat with pierre woodman

One question:
Did the Moonlanding in 1969 with Neil Armstrong realy happen or was it just a hoax (fake) filmed in a studion on earth?

I don't think that there was a man on the moon ever.
What is your opinion?

I think last night you smoked something good !!!

I have never doubted a second about the fact Americans went on the moon but after you see a tower in London burning a full day staying up, of course I have a lot of doubts about Ben Laden's responsibility concerning 9/11 !!!

PW

I have never doubted a second about the fact Americans went on the moon

Is this irony or not?
So you belief that the Moonlanding did really happen?

I was born in 1989, you are older than me, I was not there when that happened.

I was a child but I remember it !!! It was nice ...

PW

Space program was real including the moon landing...regarding the fall of the Twin Towers...heat generated by the fuel and composition and design of the building itself promoted destruction of critical junctures carrying the physical load of the floors above...Gravity works...

Well gravity twice 9 secondes and straight for two building so high let me think they take us for dumb. 420 meters of beton and metal don't fall in 9 s without some "help" !!!

PW

fum01 wrote:One question:
Did the Moonlanding in 1969 with Neil Armstrong realy happen or was it just a hoax (fake) filmed in a studion on earth?

I don't think that there was a man on the moon ever.
What is your opinion?

A completely stupid question. Ironically the technology needed to fake the moon landing simply DID NOT EXIST at the time. Photoshopping or movie editors did not exist. Meanwhile, the rocket technology did. And inumerable people including physicists has calculated everything to make sure everything regarding the missions add up, and it does.

Les tours du WTC et celle de Londres n'ont rien à voir. Le WTC avait une structure métallique, la tour londonienne pour ce que j'ai pu en voir avait une structure en béton. En chauffant le métal des tours du wtc a perdu ses capacités de résistance autour du point d'impact, il y a ensuite eu effondrement avec effet château de cartes (les structures n'étaient pas conçues pour avoir brutalement un tel poids lié à tous les étages supérieurs s'effondrant d'un coup). De part les matériaux de base utilisés pour la structure la tour londonienne était beaucoup plus capable de résister à un incendie sans s'effondrer.

rollintest wrote:Les tours du WTC et celle de Londres n'ont rien à voir. Le WTC avait une structure métallique, la tour londonienne pour ce que j'ai pu en voir avait une structure en béton. En chauffant le métal des tours du wtc a perdu ses capacités de résistance autour du point d'impact, il y a ensuite eu effondrement avec effet château de cartes (les structures n'étaient pas conçues pour avoir brutalement un tel poids lié à tous les étages supérieurs s'effondrant d'un coup). De part les matériaux de base utilisés pour la structure la tour londonienne était beaucoup plus capable de résister à un incendie sans s'effondrer.

You are right. A reinforced concrete structure will not weaken with a fire. I lived in a college dorm that was built that way, with cinder block walls. I have also lived in an apartment building that was built with brick veneer over wood. When a man fell asleep smoking in bed, the only thing left standing, was the veneer. I will bet the London high rise had a lot of flammable material.

Trivia:
In 1945 a bomber hit the Empire State Building when it was lost in a fog. It had little fuel on board. Firemen could go up the building in the elevators, and put the fire out. It was Saturday morning so only 17 people were killed. Damage was 16 million dollars in today's money. The building opened up for business Monday morning. It was built in the 1930's so the building's steel beams were stronger than necessary. They did not know how to make a structure just barely strong enough to stay up.
A elevator operator was injured. The firemen put her in an elevator to carry her down. They did not know that the cables were weakened. They broke and the terrified woman fell 75 stories in the elevator to the bottom. She survived.

I agree with Pierre in this: moon landing real, 9/11 official version fishy. At least some of it.