Mr. Woodman:
I'd have to agree with you on this one. Although we viewers and "customers" are at a disadvantage as opposed to you being there live, she came across as a prude (no anal, no swallow, wants tats gone, not an exhibitionist) who may have been discarded by other unsavory characters after ...
Search found 3 matches
- Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:42 pm
- Forum: ALL GIRLS ON SITE
- Topic: TANIA
- Replies: 8
- FANS: 5342
- Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:14 pm
- Forum: ALL GIRLS ON SITE
- Topic: JITKA
- Replies: 9
- FANS: 7708
Re: JITKA
Thank you for the response Mr. Woodman. I understand. Assuming the girl is honest (unlike the one who changed her hair color upon returning to you, having done hardcore but not admitting it), I guess you can get a pretty good idea what she has done up to that point. The interviews are priceless ...
- Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:40 am
- Forum: ALL GIRLS ON SITE
- Topic: JITKA
- Replies: 9
- FANS: 7708
Re: JITKA
Mr. Woodman:
For any given girl, on the hardcore scenes (if any) that you post AFTER the initial casting interview, there is no date of production or even any time-stamp (like the castings). Jitka is a good example. She released two DP scenes after her Aug 2003 casting interview. But only one ...
For any given girl, on the hardcore scenes (if any) that you post AFTER the initial casting interview, there is no date of production or even any time-stamp (like the castings). Jitka is a good example. She released two DP scenes after her Aug 2003 casting interview. But only one ...